Check out McCooey's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2025.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order Later
The Game of the Three Kingdoms. Another variant on Chinese Chess for three players. (Cells: 135) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Sam wrote on Sun, Jul 7, 2002 09:34 PM UTC:Poor ★
Please tell how the pieces would move in the triangle spaces, for example the knight. Also, is there a river? can the elephant become an attacker? Please tell us. Thanks for your time.

Randy wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 07:01 AM UTC:
How do u win? Is it by capturing both players OR by defeating one? i.e. If the player to your left is captured, u win. If the player to your right is aptured, the player on the left wins, so in this case, u not only have to guard yourself but a play a part by maintaing the equilibirium of power (just like during the 3 kingdoms).

ltlee1 wrote on Thu, Feb 6, 2003 11:44 AM UTC:Poor ★
No enough firing power on a large chessbroad.

Ether wrote on Mon, Jun 7, 2004 03:57 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Just to respond to previous posts:
The mid triangle section is just like the river in a regular 1-on-1 game.
Meaning it's possible to check both opponents at the same time (or any
other moves). I guess it would be less confusing if the lines that made
up
the triangles are done with dotted lines instead of solid lines. So
basically no pieces would ever actually land on any 'points' within the
big triangle.
And to win the game, you would have to beat both opponents.
When I was little, I used to team with my younger brother and play
against
our dad and it was a good learning experience.

Kwan wrote on Thu, Nov 17, 2005 03:54 PM UTC:
one more question, do u win by defeating the other two? or one wins after
one defeated one or another. if that's so the game could be quite
boring,
since u can't attack boldly on oneself,(for the other might attack you)
and if u can't attack boldly and make good moves, it's no fun about
it..


anyways don't quite understand how this works, ...sigh

Charles Gilman wrote on Sat, Sep 15, 2007 06:46 AM UTC:
I've just noticed (because it turns up on the 45-cell filter) that this is marked as a 45-cell variant, rather than a 135-cell one.

Jean-Louis Cazaux wrote on Thu, Mar 12, 2009 12:09 PM UTC:Poor ★
There is a big mistake, coming from Stephen Leary's Xiangqi FAQ which was confused on that point: this game is not The Game of Three Kingdoms.
It is the Game of Three Friends, Sanyou Qi.

Jean-Louis Cazaux wrote on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 10:20 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Thanks to David Howe, the mistake has been corrected. This page is now correct, my previous message are not relevant anymore.

Anonymous wrote on Sun, Apr 18, 2010 12:27 PM UTC:
These extra pieces looks like some 'mao variant of camel'!

Jacob Eugenio wrote on Thu, Apr 15, 2021 07:40 AM UTC:

Is there a type of game online? or here?


A. M. DeWitt wrote on Mon, Oct 25, 2021 02:54 PM UTC:

What if there was a two player version? Or I could just make one myself...


Hÿdocőżrīſe Aldaneoa wrote on Sat, May 31 06:09 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

It is good, but I(actually the game is not invented by me) have a better version of Game of Three Kings(which they introduced the inactivate army):

墙墙墙墙墙车马向侍呉侍向马车墙墙墙墙墙
墙墙墙墙墙口口口口口口口口口墙墙墙墙墙
墙墙墙墙墙口礮口口口口口礮口墙墙墙墙墙
墙墙墙墙墙勇口勇口勇口勇口勇墙墙墙墙墙
墙墙墙墙墙界界界界界界界界界墙墙墙墙墙
車口口卒界口口口口口口口口口界兵口口俥
馬口砲口界口口口口口口口口口界口炮口傌
象口口卒界口口口口口口口口口界兵口口相
士口口口界口口口口口口口口口界口口口仕
魏口口卒界口口口口口口口口口界兵口口蜀
士口口口界口口口口口口口口口界口口口仕
象口口卒界口口口口口口口口口界兵口口相
馬口砲口界口口口口口口口口口界口炮口傌
車口口卒界口口口口口口口口口界兵口口俥
墙墙墙墙墙界界界界界界界界界墙墙墙墙墙
墙墙墙墙墙口口伡口伡口伡口口墙墙墙墙墙
墙墙墙墙墙口口口口包口口口口墙墙墙墙墙
墙墙墙墙墙口口口口联口口口口墙墙墙墙墙
墙墙墙墙墙口口口盟漢合口口口墙墙墙墙墙

At first, the Han(yellow) army is inactivate(and it need not player). Wu(green) moves first, then is Wei(black), then Shu(red). The files(or ranks) that marked with 界 are borderline, pawn can move sideways for 1 square on the borderline. Once it crossed the borderline, the pawn becomes wazir, but it can only move in arena(the central 9x9 area). Elephants moves like Alfil in Shatranj. Horse moves like FIDE knight. If a player is in check, then that player must move immediately to prevent from check. Two players may becomes a team if player1's horse is at player2's confederate point, then player3 can activate the army of Han, but the Han emperor can't move. Also, if player1 captured the Han emperor(MUST WITH HORSE!!!!!!), then player1 will activate the army of Han, and player2 and player3 will become a team. If a king is in checkmate, the player that made checkmate will use the army of the player being checkmated. Once either two players have formed an alliance, neither player to the alliance can take the initiative to dissolve the alliance. Unless one of the members of the alliance is eliminated by third player, the alliance will naturally dissolve. If the alliance defeats the third player, the alliance will immediately dissolve, and the two sides will be turned from alliance to battle. 盟 means the confederate point of Wei, 联 is Shu, and 合 is Wu. If a player checkmated another two players, then the player wins. If the game runs into stalemate, or every player can not checkmate others, then the game becomes draw.


12 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.