Check out Kyoto Shogi, our featured variant for June, 2025.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Single Comment

Something to ponder: should chess variants that never can have a game end in a draw actually displease purists?[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
H. G. Muller wrote on Thu, Jun 5 02:18 PM UTC in reply to Kevin Pacey from 07:37 AM:

I agree. Having no draws means the game is decided from the beginning, and this doesn't seem a good feature. A work-around would be to play it as a shuffle game, where equally many possible initial shuffles are winning as losing. But with perfect play the game then becomes a lottery., and you might as well flip a coin in cases that would otherwise be a draw, to decide who has won.

A popular game without draws is mini-Shogi. In case of repetition (which is not a perpetual check) gote wins. Because captured pieces are dropped back in play, a game doesn't naturally peter out to a dead draw like in Chess, so rules that in an unnatural way decide an equal position in one way or the other are not needed; positions where both players have insufficient material do not exist. (Even with a bare King you can in theory still win.) It seems that the initial position is a win for gote, though, and this is a bit unsatisfactory.