I have the impression we go about picking these too late; really the selection should be made much earlier, even a month in advance; as H.G. has noted this would give greater flexibility in the selection too, as games which don't quite meet the criteria can have time to be made to, and of course it saves the scramble at the beginning of each month (which inevitably ends up late) to pick from the dwindling number of eligible games
@Fergus:
Might it be worth tracking here not only who has nominated/seconded games, but also eligibility status and perhaps even what currently makes a game ineligible if so?
I have the impression we go about picking these too late; really the selection should be made much earlier, even a month in advance; as H.G. has noted this would give greater flexibility in the selection too, as games which don't quite meet the criteria can have time to be made to, and of course it saves the scramble at the beginning of each month (which inevitably ends up late) to pick from the dwindling number of eligible games
@Fergus:
Might it be worth tracking here not only who has nominated/seconded games, but also eligibility status and perhaps even what currently makes a game ineligible if so?