I'm not against the captureMatrix, but without a good captureMatrix builder (one that shows a complete table and not just one piece at a time, as the Beta PTA gives) it's a little hard to use. From a user standpoint, at least, it would be easier to have something like transparent=N as a parameter alongside iron, antiTrade, and others in that group. Even so, I'm not sure from a programmer's standpoint whether it'd be easier to implement it that way, or build a full-scale Capture Matrix Wizard (which I'd adore in any event).
I'm not against the captureMatrix, but without a good captureMatrix builder (one that shows a complete table and not just one piece at a time, as the Beta PTA gives) it's a little hard to use. From a user standpoint, at least, it would be easier to have something like transparent=N as a parameter alongside iron, antiTrade, and others in that group. Even so, I'm not sure from a programmer's standpoint whether it'd be easier to implement it that way, or build a full-scale Capture Matrix Wizard (which I'd adore in any event).