Well, it is the pieces that are being moved. By your reasoning every chess variant coerces the pieces...
OK, so the Shoving Rook is not really what I thought: I imagined it would always end up at the square where the shoved piece was.So it is cafyabuR. I am still amazed by the things that can be described with XBetza. The only drawback is that the description is difficult to grasp for a human. I really should work some more on the bracket notation, which would describe the above move by [cR-R-buW]. A rudimentary form of this already works, but would require you to write directional modifiers on every leg, lest these would be interpreted as "going in arbitrary direction". Since the a is not needed for chaining legs in bracket notation, it could be used to indicate arbitrary direction, and the default directional modifier could be made into f.
Well, it is the pieces that are being moved. By your reasoning every chess variant coerces the pieces...
OK, so the Shoving Rook is not really what I thought: I imagined it would always end up at the square where the shoved piece was.So it is cafyabuR. I am still amazed by the things that can be described with XBetza. The only drawback is that the description is difficult to grasp for a human. I really should work some more on the bracket notation, which would describe the above move by [cR-R-buW]. A rudimentary form of this already works, but would require you to write directional modifiers on every leg, lest these would be interpreted as "going in arbitrary direction". Since the a is not needed for chaining legs in bracket notation, it could be used to indicate arbitrary direction, and the default directional modifier could be made into f.