Ben Reiniger wrote on Mon, Feb 22, 2021 04:02 AM UTC:
Very interesting! But I also have a hard time understanding this all at once.
You should give prominent definitions for "end zone" and "end field". I think the whole page would be easier to grasp quickly if you briefly described some of the rules earlier: the three options for a turn, and how pieces "throw" the stones. Then later you can clarify the differences between stones and peculiarities of piece-stone interactions. And any of the piece descriptions that can be slimmed down would be helpful (e.g., the pieces that don't have special stone-placement rules don't need to reiterate how they place stones).
(If the standard page sections are too restrictive, you can move everything into the Introduction section and add headers yourself.)
Very interesting! But I also have a hard time understanding this all at once.
You should give prominent definitions for "end zone" and "end field". I think the whole page would be easier to grasp quickly if you briefly described some of the rules earlier: the three options for a turn, and how pieces "throw" the stones. Then later you can clarify the differences between stones and peculiarities of piece-stone interactions. And any of the piece descriptions that can be slimmed down would be helpful (e.g., the pieces that don't have special stone-placement rules don't need to reiterate how they place stones).
(If the standard page sections are too restrictive, you can move everything into the Introduction section and add headers yourself.)