Johnny Luken wrote on Mon, Apr 13, 2015 11:29 AM UTC:
Any game that uses the FIDE stalemate rule has something to do with stalemate.
I'm really referring to cases in which a side has no legal move while facing an army with much greater material. I see little justification for a weaker player that has been trapped being awarded a draw in this case. For me its a loophole and nothing more.
Pawn vs bare king, or piece vs piece I would still award as a draw.
Minor pieces vs king is a grey area but I think trapping the king in such cases is worthy of a win. Imperative of movement is already central to end games, why not enforce it for moving into check and losing a game?