Check out Smess, our featured variant for February, 2025.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Single Comment

Spassky-Bronstein++[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
George Duke wrote on Wed, Apr 17, 2013 04:40 PM UTC:
[Added same 17.April.2013: Finding the ''brilliancy'' these classic games has corollary somehow that the locus of suspicion is the next several moves, not really all the way to the end. That is, the losing move, and same time correction to reverse the outcome, is one of the very next couple moves. Once again, like Fischer-Spassky 6 1972 and Polish Immortal 1929 and Reti-Alekhine 1925 all three -- again loser Black this time would appear to have the blockbuster expected Move 21, 22, 23. Which one and what improvement?] 

Move '21 Nxe6...', http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1284171,
is the CV-definitional brilliancy typically expected, so only Moves 21 to the end would be fair game for asking, Where
does Black go wrong?