H. G. Muller wrote on Wed, Jan 4, 2012 06:32 PM UTC:
Who says Xiangqi is 'finished'? (Or Chess, for that matter?) I think Asia rules for Xiangqi were proposed less than 50-years ago. And in the first half of the 20th century they still played Chess with a different initial setup (with someof the Pawns already advanced).
Aren't we trying to improve on Chess every day?
Asto the rest of the discussion: I don't think that moving back the Pawn rank with Pawns that don't have an initial double-push can count as an improvement...