[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Single Comment
Time for some politicking! OK, by the numbers:
<ol>
<p><li>
Minor. OK, but won't have a huge effect on the game.
<p><li>
Weird, but maybe interesting.
<p><li>
Interesting. I <i>think</i> it can be implemented in Zillions.
<p><li>
Too passive for my taste. The resulting game would be too positional.
<p><li>
Well, this one is odd in that there is no proposed rule to make Camel
Chess a form of drop Chess. If we adopt this one, I suppose someone could
then propose one, but really, this seems like an orphan to me.
<p><li>
I like this one! I suspect mostly it would happen as a result of a player
setting up his own pieces to promote a Pawn. And what happens if you end up with a line of King:Pawn:King? Maybe promotion to Commoner?
<p><li>
Cute idea, but it seems unlikely to have much actual effect on the game.
</ol>