💡📝Hans Aberg wrote on Thu, Apr 24, 2008 08:21 PM UTC:
H.G.Muller:
| Chess is a chaotic system, and a innocuous difference between two
| apparently completely similar positions [...] can make the difference
| between win and loss.
This is only true if positions are viewed out of context.
Humans overcome this by assigning a plan to the game. Not all position may be analyzable by such a method. The human analyzing method does not apply to all positions: only some. For effective human playing, one needs to link into the positions to which the theory applies, and avoid the others. If one does not succeed in that, a loss is likely.
The subset of positions where such a theory applies may not be chaotic, then.