John Ayer wrote on Sat, Sep 17, 2005 03:44 AM UTC:
I have read the translation linked in Eduard Navratil's comment, and it appears that there is no difference between the unicorn's (rhino's) first move and its later ones. It makes a knight's leap, and may rest at that point or continue diagonally away from its square of origin. Otherwise put, it leaps over the first square orthogonally, and from that square moves one or more squares diagonally.
As for the lion, the manuscript usually follows the medieval convention of counting a piece's square of origin in describing its move, so I think we have a leap to the second square orthogonally: what we usually call a dabbabah.
And the king and the aanca are on the wrong files. I wish some qualified editor (which I regrettably am not) would correct these various errors.
As for the lion, the manuscript usually follows the medieval convention of counting a piece's square of origin in describing its move, so I think we have a leap to the second square orthogonally: what we usually call a dabbabah.
And the king and the aanca are on the wrong files. I wish some qualified editor (which I regrettably am not) would correct these various errors.