Check out McCooey's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2025.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order LaterLatest
Xiangqi: Chinese Chess. Links and rules for Xiangqi (Chinese Chess). (9x10, Cells: 90) (Recognized!)[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Anthony wrote on Mon, Mar 14, 2005 12:58 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I managed to find a Xiang Qi set at a 'Value World' a few days ago that didn't include any directions whatsoever. This page was/is a great help!

harry wrote on Thu, Mar 24, 2005 10:31 AM UTC:
one rule in Xiangqi is : Perpetual check is forbidden. You cannot check
your opponent more than three times in a row with the same piece and same
board positions. But the software do not understand it. The device check
me no-limitted in a row wiht the same piece and same board positions. i
have to give up.

Anonymous wrote on Sun, May 1, 2005 04:40 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I have found a 'Chinese chess board' with 'material pieces':
http://www.mastersgames.com/cat/board/chinese-chess.htm
But it's expensive.

Anonymous wrote on Sat, May 14, 2005 10:17 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

alan wrote on Tue, May 24, 2005 05:51 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

(zzo38) A. Black wrote on Fri, Jun 10, 2005 09:00 PM UTC:
This comment is now obsolite. I already submitted 'Para-Xiang-qi'.

Charles Gilman wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2005 07:42 AM UTC:
There is now a Piececlopedia entry for the General itself, to which you may wish to add a link.

joe wrote on Fri, Jul 15, 2005 06:18 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
sound as £5

Roberto Lavieri wrote on Fri, Jul 15, 2005 12:38 PM UTC:
From: chinese-chess-xiang-qi.dev.java.net : 
'...Because of the huge number of players in China and the rest of Asia,
Chinese Chess is 'the' most popular game in the world...' 
There is not support for this statement, and, in my personal opinion, it
is not true, even if you are only talking about board games, and even if
you are only talking about Chess and variants.

Jared McComb wrote on Thu, Jul 21, 2005 07:12 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Roberto, I'd like to point out that as of right now, when one 
Googles 'chessvariants,' the first related page that comes up under the 
main listing is this Xiang-Qi page.  If that isn't a good indicator of 
this game's popularity variant-wise, if not game-wise in general, I don't 
know what is.

(Incidentally, a search for 'xiangqi' gives this page second in the list, 
and a search for 'xiang-qi' or 'chinese chess' gives it first.)

Jeremy Craner wrote on Thu, Oct 6, 2005 06:26 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Your readers might be interested in my free Chinese Chess program for Windows called Qianhong (Light Red)--it provides a good way to get into the game without previous Chinese Chess experience. Would you mind adding it to the list of links? Thanks! www.jcraner.com/qianhong/

Dorian Dodo Aleksei wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2005 08:38 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I just played Xiangqi today and it charmed me and everybody who played it today. Excellent game. Much better then the classic chess.

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2005 11:15 PM UTC:
try out shogi (japanese chess) and you will find another game better than 'classical' chess he he

mandarin123.com wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2005 11:30 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Rules are well explained. Just wonder if there's forum dedicated to xiangqi discussion?

laurent wrote on Fri, Oct 21, 2005 08:20 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
PLAY BY EMAIL SERVERS : brainking.com recently included xiangqi!

andy thomas wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2005 04:40 AM UTC:
i really like the cannons in xiangqi... and the fact that the game itself develops more quickly than 'fide' ... also that once the pieces become a bit unbalanced, the 'losing' side still seems to be able to mount an attack... in other words, material superiority is not as important as in 'fide'... one thing i really miss in chinese chess... there are no powerful bishops... but interestingly, the elephant can 'ambush' you because you forgot about it!... i don't know how many pieces i've lost to the otherwise 'weak' elephants... all because i forget, and the elephant does not forget!... i actually prefer xiangqi to 'fide'... i'm probably 'lower intermediate' level in both games... but they sure are fun!... anyway... getting back to the cannon... it is a very interesting piece... probably the single most interesting piece in either fide or xiangqi... when you cross over from fide to xiangqi... the cannon takes the most getting used to... at least that was my experience... finally, another site where you can play xiangqi is 'www.itsyourturn.com'... they have turn-based like brainking... i have seen some clubxiangqi players at iyt too...

Tuan wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2006 04:08 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Compared with the Western chess, I find this game is a lot more exciting. 

Only 5 pawns with a distance between them make roads for pieces come to
the enemy's territory and organize an attack. There are much less draws
than in Western chess, and you cannot play passively hoping for a draw if
you don't want to fight, the enemy's forces will overwhelm you soon.
The
battle here is more fiery than in its counterpart and draw is only
achieved through a fight with a lot of exchanges.

This game has less regard on material, you could be several pawns or one
piece down but you have chances to attack the enemy's King, it is ok
since the king is limited in His Royal Palace. Sacrifices of pieces are
seen in almost every 3 games, and two rooks (the strongest offensive
piece) sacrifice is seen in around, say, 5000 games.

ekon wrote on Sun, Mar 5, 2006 05:09 PM UTC:Poor ★
for learn more skill

Gary Gifford wrote on Sun, Mar 5, 2006 08:16 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I am primarily giving this 'excellent' to offset the 'ekon' comment of 'Poor' followed by the ekon statement of 'for learn more skill.' What kind of comment is that, aside from being terrible grammatically? The Xianqi page clearly explains the rules of Chinese Chess. The page is not 'poor,' nor is the game. If one already knows how to play and wants to get better then he or she can (a) play more games of Xianqi and (b) read one or more of the books listed in the 'Shop' section of the Xianqi page.

C.S. Graves wrote on Fri, May 5, 2006 06:06 PM UTC:BelowAverage ★★
I love xiangqi, and I'd like to see 'mao' on this page finally changed to 'ma'. Referring to the horse in xiangqi as a 'mao' caused me no small amount of embarassment when playing with a young Chinese woman at our weiqi club! Let's make this page an accurate source of information, rather than continuing to cite an author who was mistaken.

The_Beast wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 02:19 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Thanks for the page!

One small suggestion would be a mention of Gabriel's totally different offering as Chinese Chess. As someone might pick it up in a thrift store, and find they'd made a mistake based on your excellent description, a warning seems considerate.

Mind you, Gabriel's version fascinates me as no one 'owns' pieces.


KID wrote on Sun, May 14, 2006 03:29 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
a lot of good info good for my chess report

Beauty_fire wrote on Fri, May 26, 2006 12:53 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Very interesting

Fire_Dancer wrote on Fri, May 26, 2006 11:34 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
very good for me to know. Now i can play chinese chess. :)

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Sun, Jun 18, 2006 05:59 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
hey here is another 'good' rating for an 'excellent' game :)

25 comments displayed

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order LaterLatest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.