[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments by JohnLawson
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
I can't code, but I have actually played some games of Nemoroth, would be glad to help playtest when the time comes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
When H.J.R. Murray described the Lion from Chu Shogi in his book 'The History of Chess' he got the move wrong. The Lion move in this game is the one 'invented' by Murray, rather than the proper Lion move from Chu Shogi.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ee83/0ee83351b0eb4299489965417318bf09fee6666e" alt="An article on pieces"
H. J. R. Murray used the word 'orthogonal' in the sense that we modern variantists do in 'A History of Board-Games Other Than Chess' (1952) in his description of Tablut on page 63. In his 'A History of Chess' (1917), I was unable to find the use of the word 'orthogonal'. He instead uses the phrase 'horizontal or vertical'.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
breadman wrote: 'Why might the Great Dragon be less powerful than the Water Buffalo?' They both have the same Rook components. However, the Water Buffalo can also move as a Bishop, but the Great Dragon's Bishop move is restricted to three squares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60d5a/60d5abaaec2a311c86a1e864e320f13d4c69ae24" alt="A contest or tournament"
Fergus wrote, 'most people may be able to manage a pace of two moves a day in each game.' Most, but not all. I work strange hours, and am usually online between 23:00 and 01:00, when most honest folk have gone to bed. That makes more than one move per day problematic. From my point of view, more simultaneous games (say, 8) on a slower time control would be better.
The kind of thing Michael proposes would be fine with me. David shouldn't have to kick in his own money.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
Check out http://www.aikidoaus.com.au/dojo/docs/chinese_chess/notation.htm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
The pieces are in the 'standard' arrangement, with the Horses next to the Chariots.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
I dug out my copy of 'Abbott's New Card Games' (1963, Funk and Wagnalls) and the suicide rule is stated thus: 'A piece that is immobilized does have one special move that it can make, that of suicide. A player may use a turn to remove from the board one of his own pieces that is immobilized.'
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14ea6/14ea6199f27d12d771e092efd6393e1402d13956" alt="A reference work"
Hi Ryan, Go here http://www.chessvariants.com/onthese/membership.html and follow the directions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
In the games Peter and I have played, it was very unforgiving of error. Once a player fell behind, he was pretty much toast. Having the initiative was critical. If the pieces weren't recycled, the available force would rapidly become insufficient. Capturing with anything but the royal piece is no advantage, and even capturing with royal piece, which eliminates the captured piece from the game, can involve a loss of tempo which can be fatal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
Rule quote: 'A Berserker may move up to seven (7) squares in any direction or combination of directions, and must attack at the end of the move; that is, must end the move in a space occupied by an opposing piece. A Berserker may not: - pass through/over occupied squares, - end a move in an unoccupied square, - end in a square occupied by a friendly piece, or - attack the opposing king.' First, all the intermediate squares in the Berserker move must be unoccupied, so there may not be a clear path less than eight squares long. Second, a Berserker may not attack the opposing King, so it doesn't matter anyway.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
Bill - On its first move, a pawn may move 1 or 2 squares forward. Or, it may capture, but never more than one square diagonally.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
Under 'Orthogonal Atoms', the rules state that the base cost of sideways-only pieces is multiplied by 0.5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
Boards with a cell or two beyond the first and last ranks have been available as a mutator (as Joao Neto would say) at least since George Parker published Chivalry in 1888. See the World Camelot Federation website at http://groups.msn.com/worldcamelotfederation/home.msnw
<p>
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ee83/0ee83351b0eb4299489965417318bf09fee6666e" alt="An article on pieces"
Re: 'Parson's nose' In my family, as I was a child in the 1950's, the turkey tail was called the 'Pope's nose'. That is US usage, New York City matropolitan area.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
You cannot leave your King in check. This is covered in Article 9. Opponent 2 has commited an illegal move by failing to remove the check on his/her King. The move should be retracted and replayed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
No, you can't. The white pawns are moving UP the board, and the black are moving DOWN.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
Try this link. It was a little awkward to find: http://www.chessvariants.com/index/listcomments.php?subjectid=Game+Design
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be0d/1be0dc34e5c8442eb31e2ee6ea4865bd282b83fb" alt="A news item"
Congratulations! May we expect a page on 'Paloma Chess'?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
'ms' stands for 'manuscript', i.e. a handwritten book. MS 7322 is a particular manuscript, catalogue number 7322, in the collection of the British Museum. It is referenced in Murray's 'History of Chess'.
I have been a junior editor, and I just do not have the HTML skills to build new pages efficiently. [And yes, burnout was a factor. I was pretty much finished off by judging the 84-square contest.] However, I have no problem reviewing pages already built for content, and flagging them approved, since that would only take a few minutes. Submitted pages would need more than two flags. You'd need: - accepted - rejected - needs work by author - needs work by editor and also comment fields, so, for example, another editor would know why I thought more work was needed, or why a page was unacceptable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9db1/b9db1b0b5fb4ab77a8116c8cfe47b69d10096968" alt="A game information page"
So where do I go to see posted games to approve them?
Maybe put a link on the Minimal New page? (This is where I always start a visit to the CVP.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3cd0/e3cd0dd26204d03016705c51a1d496411ca13244" alt="A game information page"
Hey Glenn! Glad you're back! (Now if only I were.) A small 'typo': In the equipment section, you refer to Halberdiers instead of Sargents. This would be OK if the President were Pope.
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.