Check out Makruk (Thai Chess), our featured variant for March, 2025.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Sun, Mar 23 08:59 AM UTC in reply to Jörg Knappen from Fri Mar 21 01:59 PM:

It seems the Meticulous Mashers are indeed way too strong. An obvious way to weaken them without changing the character much would be to decrease the range of the slides, but even this doesn't appear to help much. Even a B3nD appears to be some 0,66 Pawn stronger than a Bishop, and a center-seeking FR3 even tops a Rook by more than a Pawn.

A B2nD might be as strong as a Bishop (I did not really test that), but it is a short-range piece (a lame FAD, in fact), and that spoils much of the character (and originality) of this army. The 'standard' armies were all based on a theme (orthogonal or hippogonal move domination, color binding), and if anything the theme of the Mashers would be limited-range sliding. The same objection applies to an FR2.

So I can understand why Betza retired this army. The question is whether this means we should 'expunge' it as well, or how the status of this army should be communicated better to the readers. Betza's writings are extremely interesting, but unfortunaty not very well organized. He tends to brush many subjects on the same page, making his remarks on each subject diffusely spread out over many pages, and thus hard to find. If the Mashers were retired it would be good if this was already mentioned on the page where they are presented, perhaps even before actually presenting them. And then not link to them from the main CwDA article, or make a special section for links to retired armies to satisfy historical interests.

 


Edit Form

Comment on the page Chess with Different Armies

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.