Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To Tom Hair wrote on Tue, Dec 16, 2003 10:03 PM EST:Dear Ben, Noble Chess will never be able to be played properly. To market Noble chess, the company, have my designs but not the colours. To do so would infringe my patent... GB2320205. The images are available, check them out. I spent four years and many drawings trying to work out the problem of the diagonal movements. All failed drawings are available. They have used the basic patern, so if you remove the playing pieces resting circles and colour in the outlines in their game board with four seperate colours. Two home colours, the same as a normal 8x8, 64 squared board. Now use two addittional colours as direction indicators for clockwise and anti-clockwise movements for the diagonal movements on a circular board. Then you have my chess varient. I checked their site tonight and they are even using my title to this varient in their marketing blurb, Siege Chess. You must have the two extra colours as uniform for either left or right diagonal movement. If I was a rich man my variant would be in the market place today. Because of the nature of the now circular board, it may be translated into 3d in even more variants. I am up to six so far. I plod along. You quoted a name which I cannot remember off hand as the originator of the idea behind Noble Chess in a circular format. This is in error. The basic source of circularizing all chess in a 64 squared board into a circular format is Capablanca 8/12/1970/1. I cannot remember the exact year. I would not have the patent except for Capablanca's error in his ennumeration in trying to solve the basic problem of the diagonal movement translated onto a circular board, which becomes a spiral. Tom. tom@hair77.freeserve.co.uk. Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID Noble Chess does not match any item.