Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
David Paulowich wrote on Sun, Apr 30, 2023 02:07 AM UTC:

VARIANT CHESS Volume 4, Issue 29 - Autumn 1998

On page 10 Paul V. Byway writes: "Once again it is seen that a bishop gains most from the wider board." He was discussing a drawn ending K+R+P against K+B in Modern Courier Chess (12x8 board). I had previously assumed that the Bishop would not improve much on a 12x8 board, being still limited to a maximum move of seven squares. But Byway's detailed analysis is more convincing than my own guesswork.

I still believe that the WA, FA and WDA are each worth three-quarters of a Pawn more than the original estimates given here. For this game: Knight = 3 = Work Elephant, Lead Elephant = 3.25 and Bishop = 3.75 The WA is a solid piece that continues to impress me. The FA is used in many chess variants - where it seems close to a Knight in value, perhaps a quarter-pawn less. The Lead Elephant may not attack any more squares than the FA, but the increase in mobility (also no longer colorbound) should be worth another half-pawn. Time will tell.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Wide Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.