Check out Modern Chess, our featured variant for January, 2025.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Kevin Pacey wrote on Sat, Nov 11, 2017 07:03 PM UTC:

@ V.R. & H.G.:

A small point of disagreement. Though I admit a lot of my piece valuations are arbitrary I personally would never set a bishop=4 full pawns, even if the B happened to be part of the bishop pair, no matter what the board size is. That's since I feel a bishop ought to be able to, in many cases, stop the number of pawns its worth (value rounded down to the nearest pawn when fractional), and as a rule a B cannot cope with 4 pawns (e.g. for chess see Fine's Basic Chess Endings), no matter the board size (granted there are a number of unlikely pawn structures of 4 pawns that can be stopped). However, I know I'm being arbitrary here, as in chess a rook can seldom deal with 5 passed pawns, and it's worth at least 5 pawns by many people's valuations. Thus, a value of up to 3.99 I would find more agreeable for a B.

An endgame question is, can K+2Bs as a rule hope to stop K+7or8 pawns? I think K+1B might stop 4 of the pawns, while the remaining B would have to try to deal with the remaining pawns, but such endgame could be complicated since for one thing the other side's K could try to support different pawn(s) at various junctures. However, I feel that as a rule 8 pawns would be too many to cope with. For what it's worth, Fine's book notes that 2 B's normally win vs. just 4 pawns.


Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.