Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
George Duke wrote on Fri, Feb 25, 2011 11:57 PM UTC:
Betza only tentatively goes to 80 squares here the one time in that there is not even a new piece-type for the 2 extra files. I agree insofar as that he just made up his mind to stay on the standard board. Unfortunately, probably 98% of the millions of chess players -- and potential converts to some cvs for a change -- who choose, or were taught standard f.i.d.e., rather than Xiangqi, also still think 64 squares are the only significant board. Betza's cvs' sizing is only one small not that important issue on the general question of proliferation of cvs that get less and less actual play. Of around 6000 cvs in CVPage and the print 'Encyclopedia Chess Variants', Betza has 150 and Gilman 250. Their 400 are still not yet 10% percent of the total. Betza's cvs are the more important than Gilman's, as of now, because of so many concepts for Mutators in Betza 64-square cvs that other designers can, and have, switch/ed over and adapt/ed to 80, 100, 120 squares. Betza's contribution to cvs are ideas in articles for Mutators, for augmentation of (very sensible) pieces, and for equalizing values of entire armies. That the embodiments always happen to be 64 squares is secondary. Betza was just comfortable with 64 squares, the same way of Karpov or Kasparov, or Anand, Carlsen, Aronian, Kramnik and Topolov.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Outrigger Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.