Enter Your Reply

Twelve-year-old Canadian Pranav Sharma beat grandmaster Shirov this week. 
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6132
Excuse: jet lag. Among the simul boards were 9 Draws, perfectly
understandable and agreeable in this day and age. [Karoly Szalay beat Shirov too, but that is not so significant for Szalay's being 16 years old.] However, what about the
other 25 losers? Are only super-Grandmasters entitled to rationalize? Each
of 26 should be permitted offering reasonable explanation for the outcome.
You name it. Mitigating circumstance might be any number of things.
Possible alibi for one or another may be shown in having sustained a ski
injury, or been working crossword puzzle, lighting at the table, had check delayed, to face an
examination tomorrow, or just gotten indigestion or seen recent visit from
a prodigal aunt. Anyway, instead of simuls by Grandmasters religiously all
the time, like handing out communion, why not play blindfold versus sighted
for a change, or give odds of Pawn or Knight for advantage, as in day of
Philidor or of Alexandre or Morphy or Bird.