Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Sean Duggan wrote on Sat, Jan 11, 2003 05:22 PM UTC:
After buying ZOG 2.0, I was inspired to try to implement this game again
(My last version was lost to a prior harddrive). In the process of
implementing it, there were some items that I was not able to program, so
I dropped them for the time. In particular, I do not currently have
berserking, Adept magic, and golems do not explode in close proximity to
each other (I implemented the latter two in the prior version, but they
proved too unbalancing). Otherwise, I implemented a working version of the
game.

*wry grin* I had known that my chess variant really didn't measure up to
the more professionally created ones, but I had not realized just how bad
it was until I started playing it against a computer opponent who would
exploit any possible loopholes. For one, the Assassin piece would
immediately teleport to the front lines of Mercs and mercilessly slaughter
them, who had few ways to defend themselves, let alone counter-attack. It
also tended to find ways to get the Golem to checkmate the Adept given as
it could strike through any intervening pieces, often hitting the King
before he had a chance to clear out enough room to dodge. *wry grin* When
the Golems exploded, predictably enough, the computer figured out how to
force explosions in areas filled with the opponents pieces. So, I made a
few changes.

The Archer (the Knight one {I wound up leaving the other one as a Bishop})
was not as mobile as I expected, so I added all cardinal directions,
including the diagonals to the piece. As a result, it's more mobile than
before, although it's still limitted by the fact that any particular move
has almost 4 N spaces on which it can be blocked (although, of course, two
paths have to be blocked for each move). This brought it to a similar
strength to the Bishop according to ZOG as best as I could ascertain.

The Golem mainly had its movement type changed. To facillitate easier
movement, the piece was changed so that diagonal moves were only 2 steps.
Unfortuantely, this made it easier for Golems to check or checkmate the
enemy Adept. Unsure about this piece... its invulnerability is perhaps a
bit too powerful an advantage despite its relative low mobility.

The Merc exists in a similar manner to before except that I wound up
changing the defensive slide ability to allow an attack forward when
threatened. It does help in keeping the Assassin from cherry-picking the
front lines. The promotion was changed to one more similar to Chess in
that now the Merc promotes to an Archer, Bishop, or Commander (explained
later). The piece is still limitted in that they don't support each other
nicely like Chess's Pawns do.

The Commander was originally a piece designated to represent the Merc
going backwards again. However, I realized how difficult it was for a Merc
to reach that last row so the piece was changed to have better movement
and attack scenarios. It was still not too promising, so I allowed for the
possibility to it to return to the original Merc ranks to promote again.
After adding the promotion scenario as seen above in the Merc description,
I allowed for the Commander to promote into an Archer, Bishop, Assassin,
or Golem. I may just change it so this second promotion doesn't exist and
a piece at the opposite end can promote into any of the higher rank
pieces.

The Assassin was a powerful piece to start with, and still is. The ability
to be where you can do the most damage is invaluable. The prior Assassin
strike, which involved attacking without moving, proved too powerful, as
the Assassin risked nothing by striking. Therefore, the attack has been
changed to the prototypical King movement, a one square step to any
direction. The piece is probably still a little over-powered. I've tried
variants where the piece either cannot teleport when threatened or can
only teleport to squares defended by its own pieces (Cornered and Cowardly
Assassins respectively). The second curtails the piece perhaps a bit too
much. Maybe if I only allow the piece to teleport to a spot within a
two-square range... *shrug*

The Adept exists much as before. He moves like a King. The game ends when
he's killed. The spells proved too unbalancing and, to be honest, hard to
implement, so they were taken out. His move is currently the only one that
can take out the Golem piece. I may implement the spells later, using a
'Mana Pool' implemented by a piece moving down the side so as to limit the
ability to use them too often.

As for general gameplay, Initial pawn moves generally have to be made, of
course, to let out pieces. The early game has a limitted number of 'good
moves' but this seems to be a feature of most chess games. The endgame...
currently needs tweaking. Because only one piece truly has an
across-the-board slide (The Bishop), trapping an enemy king can be
problematic. Currently, the promotion system isn't heavily used, but I am
unsure as to whether this is peculiar to ZOG or just a fact of the game.
*shrug*

Anyhow, I'm going to continue to fiddle with game mechanics, maybe submit
an updated set of rules if I ever feel it starts getting decent. Anyone
who wants a copy of the ZRF or just wants to comment can email me at
Dream@innocent.com.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Duggan's Fantasy Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.