Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To H. G. Muller wrote on Tue, Oct 14, 2008 05:43 PM UTC:I have started play-testing the Grasshopper, and first indications are that it is an exceedingly weak piece. One has to be careful, though, not to start from a normal western opening position, with a full back-rank of Pieces behind a cosed rank of Pawns. If some of the pieces are Grasshoppers, this is not a quiet position, but highly tactical. E.g., if you replace the Knights of white by Grasshoppers, white starts with 1. Gb3, with an immedite fork on Nb8 and Ng8, so that white has at least a Knight for its first Grasshopper. If two Grasshoppers replace white Bishops, black even has to give a Rook for a Grasshopper! All this initial Grasshopper tactics can be avoided by moving the pawns one rank forward. In this case no immediate forks are possible to exchange the Grasshopper from scratch against something stronger, and they have to prove their intrinsic worth. Which is very low: replacing both Bishops or both Knights of a FIDE piece set with two Grasshoppers leads to 86%-88% losses for the Grasshoppers. I am trying now replacing only one Knight or Bishop by two Grasshoppers. (The empty rank between Pieces and Pawns offers a natural possibility to start with more than 8 Pieces, in a Shogi-style array.) Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID Piece-types does not match any item.