Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
M Winther wrote on Tue, Feb 13, 2007 07:01 AM UTC:
Andy, no the Helmsman bounces whereas the Murmillo collides. The Murmillo is probably easier to understand. The bouncing, and the second leg leap pieces, are probably more difficult than the others. There is a table of bifurcation pieces here. My latest addition is the Provocator, which probably is quite good. I understand if people are sceptical towards bifurcation pieces, but at least certain of them are not difficult to master, and quite useful. They introduce new strategical and tactical themes. It becomes a different game if you introduce a new form of piece. Another interesting aspect is that it's become easy to introduce cannons in a Western context, while the cannon bifurcation pieces are more powerful than their Eastern counterparts. A counterpart of the Chinese cannon is the Crossbishop, and a counterpart of the Korean cannon is the Venator. But it's possible that colliding pieces are more easily accessible than leaping pieces. /Mats

Edit Form

Comment on the page Helmsman Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.