Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To Joe Joyce wrote on Sun, Apr 30, 2006 05:04 PM UTC:Gentlemen, let me stick an oar into these murky waters. My first question is: what do you mean by 'big board'? If you accept FIDE as the standard, then anything above 8x8 is 'big'. I would argue against that and the ideas that you need really powerful pieces, or even many pieces, and more than 1 move per turn. (At least up to, say 25x25 ;-) At 19x19, Go does quite well with merely putting non-moving pieces on the board one at a time. I've worked at 'large' sized boards (10x8, 10x10, 9x21, 16x16) and, now that I'm looking at it, the general trend is the larger the board, the fewer the pieces, and the ranges in 'linear' distance often decrease, but that's because the 9x21 is conceptually also 3x3x3x7 and the 16x16 is similarly also 4x4x4x4, so you can't go very far in any one 'direction'. Okay, you might think that last bit is all bs, but Go still elegantly demonstrates you don't need powerful pieces for a large board. And the 9x21 game (189 cells) is a chancellor chess variant using only the standard 9 pieces and pawns per side of chancellor chess. The 16x16 game (256) uses only the standard 8 pieces and pawns of FIDE per side. Andy Thomas has made some excellent points. I think he's right in all of them. I just need to know what size we're talking about, and am curious about the line between chess and wargames, like say 'Axis and Allies'. I would recommend HG Wells book 'Little Wars' as an excellent example of what is clearly over the line. (It's also got great photos.) Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID Big-board CV:s does not match any item.