Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

~~Earlier~~ ⇧Reverse Order⇩ ~~Later~~

Overboard. Very large board with original pieces. (16x16, Cells: 256) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]

Bn Em wrote on Sun, Apr 20 01:47 PM UTC:

This, alongside Champions and Sissa‐Style, would seem to me to be fine to publish, except that, formally speaking, they don't satisfy the tickbox of having Piececlopedia links where available.

@Fergus:

I get the intent behind that criterion, but I think of Piececlopedia links as more of a ‘nice‐to‐have’ than strictly necessary for an article to be good, especially if, as they are here, the move is explained adequately on the page itself. For now I'll hold off publishing on those grounds, but I'm not convinced it ought to be a formal requirement for publication

💡📝Daniel Zacharias wrote on Sun, Apr 20 06:31 PM UTC in reply to Bn Em from 01:47 PM:

I'm not sure myself if this game is ready yet, because I recently thought about changing the setup.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Mon, Apr 21 02:18 AM UTC in reply to Bn Em from Sun Apr 20 01:47 PM:

I get the intent behind that criterion, but I think of Piececlopedia links as more of a ‘nice‐to‐have’ than strictly necessary for an article to be good, especially if, as they are here, the move is explained adequately on the page itself. For now I'll hold off publishing on those grounds, but I'm not convinced it ought to be a formal requirement for publication

You can do as you see fit. If you want to add the links yourself, you can, and if you want to publish it without the links, you can do that.

🔔Notification on Mon, Apr 21 05:24 AM UTC:

The author, Daniel Zacharias, has updated this page.

💡📝Daniel Zacharias wrote on Thu, Apr 24 09:34 PM UTC:

I've added Piececlopedia links and decided to keep the setup as it is, so this should be ready.

5 comments displayed

~~Earlier~~ ⇧Reverse Order⇩ ~~Later~~

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.