Check out McCooey's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2025.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order LaterLatest
Xiangqi: Chinese Chess. Links and rules for Xiangqi (Chinese Chess). (9x10, Cells: 90) (Recognized!)[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Seongmo Yoon wrote on Tue, Feb 3, 2004 04:30 AM UTC:
http://wxf.hypermart.net/eg/index.html

'Deceptive Play in Xiangqi Openings And Countermeasures'

I downloaded the free English  e-book
but do not know how to read its notation system

Any helps?

John Lawson wrote on Tue, Feb 3, 2004 04:46 AM UTC:
Check out http://www.aikidoaus.com.au/dojo/docs/chinese_chess/notation.htm

Seongmo Yoon wrote on Tue, Feb 3, 2004 06:19 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Thanks, John!

This is from another source 
I can use this and your reference to know of Chinese chess notation.

>>From what I remember Lau just used a straightforward translation of 
>>the Chinese move notation which has been used for a long time. If you
>>have in Chinese language books you can verify this.
> 
> 
> I don't have Chinese books (as I unfortunately don't read Chinese);
but
> Lau used a pure algebraic notation.  The standard notation uses a 
> system with the symbols +, -, = to denote moves forward, back, or side-
> ward.  Lau's notation is actually easier to follow but no one else uses
it,
> so the student has to discard it and learn the standard notation later.

He simply uses english characters to represent the same thing.  From 
what I could tell his notation is easily translatable into [WA]XF by 
replacing f,b,t with +,-,=.  I may have the characters wrong, but in 
general he uses the Chinese notation with english characters just as 
[WA]XF uses chinese notation with mathematical symbols.

You should learn the characters needed to read chinese notation.  Its 
really only a few symbols more than the pieces.  You have front, back, 
side, and the numbers 1-9.

Seongmo Yoon wrote on Wed, Feb 4, 2004 04:59 AM UTC:
www.aikidoaus.com.au

by the way, this link leads me to an Aikido site.
Aikido is a Japanese martial art.

Interesting :)

I practiced Aikikai aikido  for a few months before.
Aikikai aikido is the most smooth and soft type of Aikido.

Do Aussy people practice Aikido?

DMN wrote on Tue, Feb 17, 2004 04:05 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
It is a good start for beginners in understanding one of the greatest
game,
in my opinion, ever created. As to the question of Seongmo Yoon, the
website with those free e-books on Chinese Chess requires a program
called
Adobe Acrobat to view. You can find the software free to download almost
anywhere on the internet, just search for the program through google or
you can probably find it on Download.com. It was a great site for would
be
chinese chess players...highly recommended:
http://wxf.hypermart.net/eg/index.html
Thanx Seongmo Yoon. hopes this comment helps.

Larson wrote on Thu, Feb 26, 2004 06:51 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
IS there a way for you to include link to the online multiplayer 3D Chinese
chess game I created?

http://chess.hanamifx.com/

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Mar 8, 2004 10:58 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
dfs

cychong wrote on Mon, Apr 5, 2004 06:20 PM UTC:
Hi, all xiangqi friends, i would like to introduce the following free
online chess, come and join, all xiangqi players over the world.

http://www.clubxiangqi.com

                                                        cychong
                                                   ccyacca@yahoo.com
                                                        Malaysian

Jeremy Craner wrote on Sat, Apr 17, 2004 07:33 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
<p>This is a great site for beginners, and wannabes too, like me. =) <p>[shameless plug] If you are new to Xiangqi, you might like my free Windows game. It has a range of computer AI levels (not all mine) and a nice interface. Check it out at <a href='http://www.jcraner.com/qianhong/'>http://www.jcraner.com/qianhong/</a>. Happy gaming!

w L wrote on Sat, May 29, 2004 08:13 AM UTC:Good ★★★★

lihoe wrote on Thu, Jun 3, 2004 08:02 AM UTC:
good

nouville72 wrote on Fri, Jun 11, 2004 04:37 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
XiangQi is a very good game, the more you play it, the more you find it 
clever and elegant. 

Not able to read the chinese language, I found 4 very good books on

XiangQi, written by David H.Li. The titles are :
'First Syllabus on XiangQi - Chinese Chess 1',
'Syllabus on Cannon - Chinese Chess 2',  
'Syllabus on Elephant - Chinese Chess 3'
'Syllabus on Pawn - Chinese Chess 4'

These books use the notation given by the WXF and greatly improved my
knowledge and game level.

W.H. King wrote on Sat, Jun 12, 2004 07:54 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
There is another place to find a key to the piece movement notation in the WXF's English Xiangqi Books. Actually, at the same site from where the books are downloaded, the WXF homepage... http://wxf.hypermart.net/eg/index.html The key is not on the books page. Instead, go to drop down menu 'SELECT A CATEGORY' | 'WXF ORGANIZATION' ... ... Official Piece Names and Notation'. My, they hid that key alright!

A. DaRocha wrote on Wed, Jun 16, 2004 02:56 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
My roommate just came back from China, and she brought me a Chinese Chess board, but it had no instructions. This website is GREAT! The visual setup of the pieces is just what I needed. A. DaRocha <a href='http://www.darocha.org'>www.darocha.org</a> <a href='http://www.xtremeburn.com'>www.xtremeburn.com</a>

Brandon Wallace wrote on Sat, Jul 17, 2004 11:16 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I recently visited China on a student tour. I was absolutely fascinated with the many groups of raggedy men gathered around a game board. So I, of course found the name of the game and ensured that I'd learn it when I got in the states. And after searching many-a-many sites to learn I was only dissapointed. This site- your site- however, has fully satisfied my curiosity. I am gratefull to have found such a nice mentor site.

Anonymous wrote on Sat, Jul 24, 2004 10:12 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
thanks!

Anonymous wrote on Tue, Jul 27, 2004 08:24 PM UTC:
Do you know <i>why</i> the symbols on most Red pieces are different <BR> from the symbols on the corresponding Black pieces?

Jianying Ji wrote on Wed, Jul 28, 2004 05:40 AM UTC:
The reason the characters are different from what I hear is that in ancient times xiangqi is played with pieces that are not differentiated by color. So the characters and the shape of the base were ways in which the two sides are differentiated.

Anonymous wrote on Fri, Jul 30, 2004 04:14 PM UTC:
Also, what do the symbols on each of the pieces mean?

Anonymous wrote on Thu, Aug 12, 2004 06:20 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
I Think you should also post the traditional characters for the pieces instead of just the simplified ones.

Charles Gilman wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2004 08:24 AM UTC:
The idea that the differing symbols for similar opposing pieces were necessary long ago ties in with the Cannon, a latecomer to the game, being one of the pieces for which both armies use the same symbol.

Anonymous wrote on Sat, Oct 9, 2004 04:40 PM UTC:Good ★★★★

Xin Ying wrote on Thu, Dec 30, 2004 03:45 PM UTC:Poor ★
There wasn't any conclusions i could find for the game...
but as a chinese, i admit that i like this game a lot even though i do not
play it often...

Robert N wrote on Wed, Jan 5, 2005 11:37 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
What a site! For a lover of fairy chess etc. like me.

Years ago I saw this beatiful chess set and wanted it, but could not
afford to pay D. kr. 1.500 (appr. 300 dollars). This Christmas my
girlfriend gave it to me! I never told her my wish, so it is simply the
best Christmas present I have recived, ever.

It is very beautiful, a smaller copy of the terracotta figures from the
grave of Qin Shi Huang Di, first emperor of China - much more visual than
Chinese characters. The ministers and guards are very alike, though
(anyone else out there who has a set and knows which one has a split
hair-do and which one does not?)

She worried that it was not standard chess. I thought great that it is
not, though rules did not follow (and I thought Chinese and Japanese
chess
were the same...), so we picked up some simple, and flawed rules on the
Internet.

I have played several games with my self or the kids. We have made three
major mistakes: 1. The ministers (elephants) could leap (minor mistake
actually). 2. I thought the way the horse moved was in a simple L-shape:
One step orthogonally and two steps to the side - or two steps, then one
step. This gives some other points where one cannot leap, including
different opening options. 3. Great mistake: I thought the cannons could
only capture a token directly behind another token (in stead of the great
leap for cannon-kind of the real rules), which makes it a rather weak
token in it self.

Glad you set me straight on all points, though I will recommend my
'wrong
variant', which gives a very complicated and defensive game (with some
tendency to produce tied games). The 'wrong horse moves' I will
recommend in general, for variation.

Looking forward to testing out your variants and the Chorean chess on the
board...

mhau wrote on Mon, Jan 17, 2005 10:20 PM UTC:Good ★★★★

25 comments displayed

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order LaterLatest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.