Comments by jean-louiscazaux

Ok. Re-done as you indicated.

Nice page. Thank you.

Thank you HG. I have corrected with your suggested phrasing.

For Mexican chess, yes I knew. You probably missed that I had mentioned this in the Notes section.

Mephisto was even more similar. But we don't know all details.

@Greg Strong What is this list of files.txt, do they have something special ? I don't understand what means "the available includes files" ?

Sorry, I'm lost.

Thank you Fergus. I think I've understood the idea, also for your other answer. Not sure I'll be able to handle this right now, but I will try if I need. I feel like being a yellow or orange belt at judo and you guys being black belt. :=) Thanks also for your patience.

Thank you HG. My problem is simplest than that. For a guy like me, every new tool needs some investment to get used with. I understood that the Play-test can do wonderful things and I see others using it, but I still have to devote some time to understand how to use it. It is certainly worth to do it for me but so far I have not used it yet.

My skills are limited. Even to create a simple Game Courier, it represents an effort for me to remember how to create a page that links to a GC, call the other page which presents the rule, make a diagram and link it, etc. For you, Fergus, and other editors, it is piece of cake. For me it is quite an effort to remember the "path".

For example, I simply want to make a GC for Devingt Chess, the page I made recently (btw, can someone publish it now?). Devingt Chess is almost structured like Bear Chess, so I can make code the GC easily, but I struggle how to make the page that will present it. Aargh.

Thanks for all.

The problems seem to come again. I cannot access to any of my on-going games. Just me?

Dear editors I believe this page, GC to play Pemba, is ready to be published. Thank you

Originally posted on Pemba, where this piece is called a Crocodile.

Dear Fergus

I'm glad you accept my first point.

For the second, you just repeat what I said, it is a name consistent with my tree of CV, so I don't see why you insist it is only consistent with myself. It is what I said. To elaborate more, I don't want to give another name to a piece I have used under this name on 6 or 7 other variants.

For the last and most interesting point, sure your objection is valid. Indeed a Bishop is not a Vao. But both are diagonal and this is just the starting point of the association I'm making. It is a thin point, but it is better than nothing and there are plenty CVs where there is no logic at all behind the naming of the pieces. The way you had chosen Arrow is very elegant, really. I have nothing against that. Few years ago when I was using a Vao I used to call it a Bowman, which is not so far from your idea. I have no problem you call this piece an Arrow, just let me call it a Crocodile if I like. (And Vao is not a good name imo, I would have say a Xao to look more Chinese and the X is better bearing the diagonal character than the V)

For the last point on Alfonso's codex, I worked very closely with Sonja Musser who got her PhD on this text and together we studied carefully the Spanish text (hablo español). Of course a Cocatrice is a mythical beast, and a Crocodile is a real animal. I know this. But in 1283 they didn't have Wikipedia, and behind many mythical beast there is sometimes a real animal, living in very remote lands, that could have inspired the legend. Interestingly, this is the case in this Codex with the Aanca, for the Unicornio and for the Cocatriz. About this animal the text says: E la otra que esta dell otro cabo del Rey a la mano derecha es a semeianca dela Cocatriz que es bestia & pescado. & esta es fecha como lagarto. & cria en las aguas dulces & sennalada mientre en el grant rio que llaman nilo. & ha tan grant fuerca que teniendo los dos pies de caga o la cola en el agua; no a cosa que tome en seco que non tire assi por fuerte que sea. & quando quiere tomar alguna cosa;

Sonja Musser translates as this: To the right of the [white] King is a Crocodile [The crocodile's piece is very realistically drawn] which is a beast and a fish like a lizard. It lives in fresh water, notably in the great river called the Nile. It is so strong that with two hind feet and its tail in the water that nothing it grabs on land can escape. Whenever it wants to grab something it pretends that it is looking somewhere else to lull it into a false sense of security and then it turns quickly and obliquely and goes after it until it captures it.

If you see a better description than a crocodile, tell us. The depiction I was talking about, and S.Musser is talking about, is the unique illustration that is known of this game, the one on the codex. Please refer to it, the drawing is small but it really looks like a crocodile. Everyone can check with good faith. We have this and no more than that.

Also you may understand that a given name of a mythical animal could refer to different representation for different people, different places, different times. A gryphon could have goat's legs here, a snake's tail there, etc.